![]() ![]() If it appears that we are not going to meet our target through co-operation, we will review the options for stopping UK residents accessing websites on the IWF list. For new ISPs or services, we would expect them to put in place measures within nine months of offering the service to the public. of connections is not enough and we are setting a target that by the end of 2007, all ISPs offering broadband internet connectivity to the UK general public put in place technical measures that prevent their customers accessing websites containing illegal images of child abuse identified by the IWF. We recognise the progress that has been made as a result of the industry's commitment and investment so far. of domestic broadband connections) are either currently blocking or have plans to by the end of 2006. Currently, all the 3G mobile network operators block their mobile customers from accessing these sites and the biggest ISPs (who between them provide over 90 per cent. It is clear from the various meetings that Ministers have had with the ISPs, that the industry has the will to implement solutions to block these websites. Recently, it has become technically feasible for ISPs to block home users' access to websites irrespective of where in the world they are hosted. This is evidenced, for example, by their commitment to and funding of the Internet Watch Foundation (IWF) and the reduction in the proportion of illegal sites reported to the IWF that are hosted in the UK from 18 per cent. UK internet service providers (ISPs) continue to lead the world in tackling this issue and the majority are committed to taking all steps available to them to prevent users accessing illegal images of child abuse. Simplistic laws mandating censorship at the ISP level may create real social harm. These issues require that the implementation of censorship move away from ISPs and into the hands of parents. Finally a conservative filter may block material a liberal parent may be happy for a child to see. Similarly a liberal filter may allow content a conservative parent may not permit for their child. There is a real danger of ignoring genuine problems or strong expressions of emotion because those voices cannot be heard. Just because liberal ideas are popular (perhaps correctly so) does not mean that illiberal voices are always factually incorrect. Filters prepared by liberal organisations may block material from conservative organisations creating a unilaterally imposed barrier to free speech. For example, Vodafone's 3G services has been observed blocking technical blogs perhaps due to the s exuality of the author even during outages to censorship system components.Įnforcement of a one-size-fits-all world view. The identification of material as problematic when it is actually harmless. Individual pages with no extension at the end The Times reports that the Britain's film censor is suggesting that it could provide the first classifications for content of the internet.Įxactly what is censored is unknown however in 2008 the cleanfeed list contained: On the Vernon Coaker, Parliamentary Under-Secretary, Home Office set a deadline in a written answer of the end of 2007 for all ISPs to put in place technical measures that prevent their customers accessing websites containing illegal images of child abuse identified by the IWF. ISPs can be required to remove (or block access to) information of use to terrorist. They now block sites identified as containing child p ornography and criminally racist content. Most ISPs undertake limited censorship of web sites as a result of the threat of legal action from the police. ![]() However people do want the option of being able to download tools that help them control what they and their children will see on the Internet. The UK government has consulted on this issue and has concluded that people do not want the government to censor the Internet for them. This can be done because the content is prohibited by law or because the content is considered morally objectionable, or because the government or company does not like what is being said. The blocking of content on the Internet from users in a country by a government or provider. 6 Campaign against censorship on the Internet. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |